What's with the double standard? There seems to be a disconnect between what people agree can be said to someone's face and what people can say on a public internet forum.
I see defense of language in the article and that doesn't add up with what people refer to as 'fatuous vitriol' and are up in arms about on HN comments.
I see defense of language in the article and that doesn't add up with what people refer to as 'fatuous vitriol' and are up in arms about on HN comments.
I guess there are no hellbannings in 'real life.'