Aren't the iPhone and the Samsung Galaxy S3 functionally equivalent? For the sake of argument, haven't competitors succeeded in "copying" the iPhone to their hearts' content? Note that trade dress is a class of IP on its own that definitely has helped Apple, since competitors can't create products and try to pass them off as the iPhone itself.
The iPhone is a very successful product, and it owes very little of that success to patents.
The iPhone is a very successful product, and it owes very little of that success to patents.