Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

prior art should be too hard to find, the whole concept of scrolling up to refresh is exactly the same concept as infinite-scrolling. if you scroll below the bottom of a list, it finds the next n older items. if you scroll above the top of a list, it finds the next n newer items. what's the difference?


There are several differences. Firstly it's only triggered when you pull past a certain threshold, and secondly it refreshes all new items - not just the ones that cover the uncovered scroll region. It's also cancellable before you reach a certain threshold, and clear feedback is given about this.

Regardless of where you stand on patents, this is certainly not the same as infinite scrolling.


There's a distinct tactile feel to the pull to refresh that is distinct from infinite-scrolling. I remember the first time I saw it, I was surprised, but understood what it meant almost immediately.


except that feelings are not patentable. mechanisms are. it's the same mechanism and the same technology.

specifically, the patent covers updating what's on the screen depending on what portion of the screen is displayed. that's exactly infinite scrolling.


There have been look-and-feel patent fights.


there have been, but this is not a design patent. it's a technical patent.




Consider applying for YC's Fall 2026 batch! Applications are open till July 27.

Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: