Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

They open sourced it too late for it to get much traction, I think.

Also, does it solve any particular problem in such a way that it can't be ignored? Doesn't seem like it to me.



There were the problems with the license for some years.

http://www.gnu.org/philosophy/plan-nine.html

Once it became "free" it had too little functionality.

There's too little of the software and it's not so easy to port the existing Unix/Linux software:

http://plan9.bell-labs.com/wiki/plan9/porting_alien_software...

Moreover, very, very little of the hardware is supported.


Yeah, it wasn't open source. Edit: wikipedia says it was only open sourced in 2002.

Incidentally, the 'crossing the chasm' approach would be to find some niche where a new OS could succeed - perhaps something where the network effects were less pernicious.


I think you're right. Plan9's first "public" (to universities only) release was 1992, when Linux was just getting off the ground and the FreeBSD & NetBSD projects did not yet exist. People interested in Linux or 386BSD at the time would have probably tried Plan9 if they could have.




Consider applying for YC's Fall 2026 batch! Applications are open till July 27.

Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: