Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

I really hope we get there soon. Not only could this eliminate usage of herbicides, but many smaller autonomous robots vs one really big John Deere could also remove the need for monocultures. And that would really be a major improvement for both crop yields and the environment


Would be fantastic to sit and watch an army of spindly legged robots stride around the place doing that.

Would be straight out of sci-fi.

Robot horticulture has long been a staple.


A step closer to this. http://i.imgur.com/f7hccDn.gif


The premise of the matrix violates the first law of thermodynamics; It's just a plot device.


Except although the movie does say battery. That's not the original plot device that was written. They were originally written as human based cpu computers. But some higher up thought people wouldn't understand "human processors" so just everytime you think about or watch the matrix again. Just think it's a poor mistranslation that made it into the movie, "processor->battery"


Of course battery is just what Morpheus and the others from Zion think is the story.

Considering how wrong they were on other important matters the battery explanation could easily be wrong and the CPU correct.


Wasn't there some deleted dialog about this?

I'm paraphrasing, but Neo says "that's impossible (in reference to the Matrix) since it violates the laws of thermodynamics"

To which Morpheus replies "and where did you learn about the laws of thermodynamics?"

If you're in the Matrix, your knowledge of the Matrix would come from the Matrix itself which would have a bias towards falsifying information to preserve itself.


I remember reading Indians of the Northeast planted corn, beans, and melons together. So switching to polycuture crops should have advantages.

One other thing I've read is that annual plants were the easiest plants to domesticate because the short life cycle results in faster evolution. However perennials are likely way less environmentally destructive.


As someone who lives in a country where 55% of the population is involved in agriculture, it sounds more terrifying than wonderful.

What will all these people do once farmers are unnecessary?


> What will all these people do once farmers are unnecessary?

There aren't that many people working on farms in developed countries. In the US, only around 3 million people (or <1% of the total population) work on a farm. [0]

In other countries where many people are involved in agriculture, the pending industrialisation/automation of farming will probably have a similar impact to what happened in North America and Europe over the 20th century: more people will move to urban areas and add value to the economy in other ways.

[0] https://www.agcensus.usda.gov/Publications/2012/Online_Resou...


I'm talking about India. 55% of the workforce turns into hundreds of millions of people.


>What will all these people do once farmers are unnecessary?

The answer is "whatever they want". The big problem facing governments everywhere right now is how to jump over the little gully of poverty that comes right after the change to get there.


I'm worried that the "gully of poverty" will be crossed over the bodies of the surplus citizenry.


Farming is already ridiculously automated. Seems like a battle long lost.


corn is a tall crop, soy beans are short. Farmers are already experimenting with things like 4 rows of corn 4 soybeans. The corn rows shade the soybean rows and so reduce yield - but in turn the soybeans are not shading the corn so they get slightly better corn yields. This is still experimental, but so far it looks promising.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: