Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit | looopTools's commentslogin

I had the privileged of seeing him deliver at Keynote at IEEE GlobeCom in 2019. He was funny, an amazing presenter, and very down to earth.


Whilst I find yocto perfectly fine. I also see that it has its limitations. I think there is a need to make yocto more nimble rather than designing a whole new build system.

yoebuild does seem interesting at least as a proof-of-concept.


This honestly saddens me a little. From the PowerMac's to the MacPro I always loved them when having the opportunity to work with them. Plus I loved the expandability they offered.

I don't find the external GPU houses for Mac Studio as appealing to use.


They were a great aspirational product in the "when I win the lottery" category.


As I understand it, it is just like in Opera. So a proxy not a VPN. I honestly find it distasteful that they may call it a VPN without it actually being one.


Because people understand VPN but not necessarily proxy. It's targeted to non-tech people.


What makes a proxy a "VPN" again? Most popular "VPN" companies only offer a proxy that merely runs over a VPN protocol.


> Most popular "VPN" companies only offer a proxy that merely runs over a VPN protocol.

Well that doesn't seem true?

Mullvad, Proton, Private Internet Access, NordVPN, ExpressVPN etc are all VPNs. You can use them for whatever protocol you want.


All of them offer only proxied access to the internet. They do not expose access to any "private network".


Depends on the VPN, I remember Nord had a private p2p network that allowed users of their VPN service to communicate directly with each other without exposing their p2p services to the greater internet.

Granted, its been a lomg time since I used Nord, not sure if they still offer that service.


Well, only some of them actually offer full VPN service. Most of them are still just traffic-forwarding proxies, just not limited to HTTP. NordVPN used to offer full VPN service under the name "Meshnet", but actually discontinued it last year.


> You can use them for whatever protocol you want.

the two most commons protocols used for proxying traffic support arbitrary tcp traffic. socks is quite self explanatory but http is not limited to https either!

Of course most providers might block non https traffic by doing DPI or (more realistically) refusing to proxy ports other than 80/443 but nothing is inherent to the protocol.

edit: this is also mentioned on MDN: https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Web/HTTP/Reference/...

> Aside from enabling secure access to websites behind proxies, a HTTP tunnel provides a way to allow traffic that would otherwise be restricted (SSH or FTP) over the HTTP(S) protocol.

> If you are running a proxy that supports CONNECT, restrict its use to a set of known ports or a configurable list of safe request targets

> A loosely-configured proxy may be abused to forward traffic such as SMTP to relay spam email, for example.


To complement your comment, SOCKS 5 also supports two, less known kinds of traffic: UDP and the server side of TCP

https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc1928#page-6


IMO if it requires a new network interface to be created on the machine, then it's a VPN. But an application-level tunnel (such as SOCKS) would just be a proxy.


A VPN as you refer to it isn't a VPN either. There's no private network that is virtualized. Actual VPN software is like Tailscale.


From the perspective of the browser there is no difference.


Is the proxy encrypted? If so then you might as well call it a VPN.


We did not get as recommend or required reading in a course. But the professor did recommend it to me outside of class.


I cannot believe I am saying this, but I am honestly thinking about getting one. So my iPad Pro is nice and I love my Mac Studio, but my MacBook Pro is out of support and installing Fedora Linux on it will be a hassle due to the touchbar from what I can tell. So I am actually in a marked for a laptop to just write on when I am on the go... The neo fits that spec perfectly....


Besides the the lack of a magsafe which I find essential for a kids laptop, I think it is perfect from a kid in the age 10-15... Unless they want to game of course.


If it has sufficient accuracy then this could be cool. But I want to see it battle tested before raising my arms to high


I agree with others whom see the identification problem. But I also think that it is a right step on the way to help improve the current situation


I cannot wait to show this to a colleague of mine. He will kill me XD


Can't wait to learn of how it went!


Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: